Invisible Super-Tech in Elections
How Digital Media and AI (Probably) Shaped Public Sentiment in Europe
On December 6, 2024, Romania’s constitutional court took the extraordinary step of annulling the results of the country’s presidential election, citing evidence of widespread disinformation campaigns and alleged foreign interference. The election, which had already drawn international attention for its polarizing rhetoric and unconventional candidates, became the epicenter of a digital storm. Platforms like YouTube, Facebook, TikTok were inundated with often misleading content, that went viral, while reports surfaced of advanced AI-driven influence operations working to manipulate voter sentiment.
The annulment marked a watershed moment for European democracies, exposing the growing vulnerability of even the most connected and regulated societies to invisible, technology-driven sentiment manipulation.
The events in Romania draw intriguing parallels to a recently concluded elections in Asia. Sri Lanka, like Romania, is no stranger to high social media penetration and digital engagement. In both cases, platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok served as battlegrounds for the flow of information — both legitimate and questionable. While no concrete evidence has yet emerged, the possibility that advanced tools like AI-driven sentiment analysis, deepfake technologies, and algorithmic manipulation played a role in shaping voter perceptions in Sri Lanka remains an open question.
Given the stakes and the effectiveness of such methods elsewhere, it’s worth considering whether interested actors — both domestic and foreign — leveraged these techniques to influence the outcomes in Sri Lanka, highlighting the increasingly blurred lines between organic public opinion and engineered influence.
In an era where information is King, the ability to harness social and digital media to influence public sentiment has transformed from a tactical tool to a strategic weapon. These events surrounding Romania’s annulled presidential elections provide a stark reminder of the immense power wielded by those capable of manipulating public discourse using advanced technologies. While European nations pride themselves on high digital literacy and robust democratic institutions, these very attributes have become double-edged swords, making them ripe for subtle yet devastating interference.
The digital revolution promised to democratize information and empower individuals. Instead, it has armed organizations, state actors, and shadowy entities and even individuals with tools of unprecedented power to manipulate public opinion, reshape political landscapes, and undermine democratic institutions. This annulment of Romania’s presidential elections offers a chilling case study in how invisible super-technologies are weaponizing social and digital media to influence public sentiment.
Beyond Romania: A Broader European Vulnerability
The Romanian presidential election crisis, where allegations of Russian interference and viral disinformation campaigns, shows it is near impossible to be immune to digital manipulation. Allegations of advanced influence operations involved the deployment of coordinated disinformation campaigns, deepfake technologies, and the exploitation of algorithms on social media platforms to polarize voters and delegitimize the electoral process.
The fallout from Romania’s annulled presidential election has reverberated beyond its borders, prompting Bulgarian MPs to launch an investigation into potential Russian influence in their own political sphere. As reported by Euractiv, the allegations surrounding Romania’s elections — centered on disinformation campaigns and covert manipulation — have raised alarms across neighboring countries. Bulgarian lawmakers are now scrutinizing whether similar tactics, including the use of AI-driven disinformation and social media influence, may have been employed to interfere with their domestic politics. This regional response underscores the broader implications of Romania’s crisis, highlighting the growing concern over invisible super-technologies and their ability to destabilize democracies in Eastern Europe. It also raises pressing questions about the extent of such influence and the preparedness of European nations to counter these sophisticated threats.
The Romanian Election Crisis: A Case Study in Digital Manipulation
This crisis did not occur in isolation. It unfolded within a global context where similar tactics have been deployed with alarming frequency, from Brexit to the 2016 and 2020 U.S. elections. In Romania, however, the situation is unique because the election’s annulment lays bare the vulnerabilities of democratic institutions when confronted with invisible super-technologies — tools so advanced that their mechanisms remain hidden even from the most vigilant watchdogs.
Europe’s Digital Paradox
Europe is often viewed as a bastion of democratic values and a defender of free expression. It boasts high internet penetration, widespread access to education, and sophisticated regulatory frameworks. However, these strengths also make it a prime target for digitally driven manipulation. High digital literacy means populations are deeply engaged with online platforms, but this engagement comes with risks.
Social media platforms like TikTok, Facebook, YouTube and X (formerly Twitter) have become critical arenas for political discourse. But they also serve as conduits for manipulation. Advanced AI technologies enable the creation of hyper-targeted content designed to exploit users’ psychological and emotional vulnerabilities. From crafting convincing conspiracy theories to amplifying fringe voices, these technologies can manufacture consensus, distort reality, and destabilize democratic systems — all while remaining undetected.
The Rise of Invisible Super-Tech
At the heart of this phenomenon lies what I call “invisible super-tech.” These are highly sophisticated tools that leverage artificial intelligence, big data, and machine learning to manipulate public sentiment on a massive scale. Unlike traditional propaganda, which is overt and often crude, these technologies can operate with surgical precision.
Key components of invisible super-tech include:
- Deepfakes and Synthetic Media: The creation of hyper-realistic fake videos, images, and audio that can damage reputations, spread misinformation, or create false narratives.
- Sentiment Manipulation: AI-driven tools that analyze public sentiment in real time and deploy tailored messages to shift opinions.
- Algorithm Exploitation: Manipulating social media algorithms to amplify certain messages while suppressing others, creating echo chambers that distort reality.
- Synthetic Identities: Networks of fake personas that generate and spread content, giving the illusion of grassroots support.
- Profiling and Targeting: Ability to profile and target users based on previous digital footprints, behaviors and social media presence
In Romania, reports indicate that these technologies were used to generate disinformation campaigns that ended up being viral to undermine trust in democratic institutions, and amplify divisions. This strategy is particularly effective in a politically polarized environment, where even minor nudges can have outsized effects on public perception.
Global Implications
The Romanian election crisis is the tip of a much larger trend. Across the globe, democracies are struggling to adapt to the challenges posed by digital manipulation. In the United States, we have seen how these technologies have been used to influence elections and sow discord. In Europe, the issue is equally urgent, as nations face threats not only from external actors like but also from internal forces leveraging these tools for political gain.
Despite their technological sophistication, Western democracies have been caught flat-footed. Intelligence agencies, traditionally focused on conventional threats, are ill-equipped to combat decentralized and distributed influence operations. Regulatory frameworks lag behind the rapid pace of technological innovation, leaving social media platforms to police themselves — a task at which they have repeatedly failed and/or not motivated to engage in due to commercial benefits. For example, it is estimated over a $1 Billion was spent solely on social media during US Presidential Election.
Why It’s Under the Radar
The true danger of invisible super-tech lies in its stealth. Unlike traditional forms of political interference, which are often overt and traceable, these technologies operate in the shadows. Their effects are felt but rarely seen and operators are rarely visible or traceable, often not even located in the same georgraphic areas. They can sway elections, undermine institutions, and reshape public opinion without leaving clear evidence of their involvement from thousands of miles away.
This stealth has allowed these technologies to evade scrutiny, even from intelligence agencies in the United States and Europe. The decentralized nature of digital platforms further complicates detection and attribution, creating a perfect storm for manipulation.
Whats Next?
The Romanian election crisis is a wake-up call for democracies worldwide. It underscores the need for a multi-faceted approach to counter the threats posed by invisible super-tech:
- Regulatory Overhaul: Governments must implement stricter regulations on social media platforms, including transparency requirements for algorithms and content moderation practices.
- Investment in Counter-Technologies: Developing AI-driven tools to detect and neutralize deepfakes, synthetic identities, and coordinated influence campaigns.
- Public Education: Equipping citizens with the knowledge and tools to identify and resist manipulation.
- International Collaboration: Democracies must work together to create norms and frameworks for addressing digital interference.
As I argued in my previous Medium article on U.S. elections, we are witnessing the emergence of a new political arms race fueled by AI and driven by invisible super-tech. The stakes are no longer confined to individual elections or nations. This is a battle for the future of democracy itself.
The Romanian election crisis is a harbinger of what’s to come. It highlights the transformative — and terrifying — potential of advanced technologies to shape public opinion, disrupt institutions, and upend political norms. As these tools continue to evolve, the question is not whether they will be used, but how — and whether democracies can adapt in time to defend themselves.
Previous: The Impact of AI and Invisible Super-Tech on U.S. Elections: A New Political Arms Race
